Physical distancing ≠ physical inactivity

13Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During this time of global health crisis, physical distancing, along with mask wearing, has emerged as the sine qua non social practice to protect ourselves and others from COVID-19. But as physical distancing ensues and all eyes remain fixed on the novel coronavirus, another, albeit careworn, pandemic rages on. Physical inactivity, the world's fourth leading cause of death, may indeed be exacerbated by physical distancing measures, such as sheltering at home and closing or limiting access to recreation and exercise facilities. The purpose of this paper is to urge public health and medical professionals not to forget the importance of physical activity to whole-person health, recognize the importance of physical activity as a potential COVID-19 mitigation strategy and to serve as advocates for promoting active lifestyles. It is imperative that the national call for physical distancing not be interpreted as a call for physical inactivity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meyer, S. M., Landry, M. J., Gustat, J., Lemon, S. C., & Webster, C. A. (2021). Physical distancing ≠ physical inactivity. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(4), 941–944. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free