Refractory strictures post-esophageal atresia repair: What are the alternatives?

48Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Esophageal strictures remain the most frequent complication after esophageal atresia (EA) repair despite refinements in operative techniques. With an incidence of anastomotic stricture between 8% and 49%, EA is the most frequent cause of benign esophageal stricture in children. The mainstay of treatment for esophageal stricture is dilatation with a 58-96% success rate. In order to relieve dysphagia, between 1 and 15 dilatations will be required in each EA patient with an esophageal stricture. However dilatations may lead to complications including perforation (0.1-0.4% of all esophageal benign strictures) and sociopsychological morbidity. Fifty percent of EA strictures will improve in 6 months. However, 30% will persist and require repeat dilatations. The present article explores the variety of non-surgical alternative treatments for anastomotic strictures after EA repair, focusing on triamcinolone acetonide, mitomycin C and esophageal stents. We propose an algorithm for a more standardized therapeutic approach, with the hope that an international panel of experts could meet and establish a consensus. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lévesque, D., Baird, R., & Laberge, J. M. (2013, May). Refractory strictures post-esophageal atresia repair: What are the alternatives? Diseases of the Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free