Strengthening protections for human subjects: Proposed restrictions on the publication of transplant research involving prisoners

3Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Publication is one of the primary rewards in the academic research community and is the first step in the dissemination of a new discovery that could lead to recognition and opportunity. Because of this, the publication of research can serve as a tacit endorsement of the methodology behind the science. This becomes a problem when vulnerable populations that are incapable of giving legitimate informed consent, such as prisoners, are used in research. The problem is especially critical in the field of transplant research, in which unverified consent can enable research that exploits the vulnerabilities of prisoners, especially those awaiting execution. Because the doctrine of informed consent is central to the protection of vulnerable populations, we have performed a historical analysis of the standards of informed consent in codes of international human subject protections to form the foundation for our limit and ban recommendations: (1) limit the publication of transplant research involving prisoners in general and (2) ban the publication of transplant research involving executed prisoners in particular. Liver Transpl 19:362-368, 2013. © 2013 AASLD. Copyright © 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valapour, M., Paulson, K. M., & Hilde, A. (2013). Strengthening protections for human subjects: Proposed restrictions on the publication of transplant research involving prisoners. Liver Transplantation, 19(4), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23603

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free