A Necessary Inhumanity?

23Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is argued that the phrase "Necessary Inhumanity" more accurately describes the alienation required of doctors in some circumstances, than do modern sanitised coinages such as 'clinical detachment'. 'Detachment' and 'objectivity' imply separatton, not engagement: creating distance not only from patients, but from the self: the process may well be required, but where it becomes too extreme or prolonged, it can damage everybody, including patients, family members, doctors themselves, and wider society. An awareness of the history of health care in the context of our society might assist self reflection-might help keep initiates in touch with the culture they have been induced to leave and might help them remain humane despite the bruising process of training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richardson, R. (2000). A Necessary Inhumanity? Medical Humanities, 26(2), 104–106. https://doi.org/10.1136/mh.26.2.104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free