Why Have So Many Drugs with Stellar Results in Laboratory Stroke Models Failed in Clinical Trials?

  • CURRY S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A bstract : The failure, in the clinic, of at least fourteen potential neuroprotective agents expected to aid in recovery from stroke, after studies in animal models had predicted that they would be successful, is examined in relation to principles of extrapolation of data from animals to humans. Allometric scaling of glutamate data, especially duration of elevated glutamate levels in CSF and plasma, is used to support a hypothesis that treatment needs to be extended for the time that glutamate is elevated in the individual patient. According to this scenario, trials should be restricted to patients with progressing stroke and associated elevated glutamate levels, and patients without elevated glutamate might show adverse effects of drug treatment if normal levels of glutamate, which may be associated with neuroprotection, are antagonized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

CURRY, S. H. (2003). Why Have So Many Drugs with Stellar Results in Laboratory Stroke Models Failed in Clinical Trials? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 993(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07512.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free