Assessment and Reporting of Harm

  • Friedman L
  • Furberg C
  • DeMets D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Assessment of harm is more complex than the assessment of benefit of an intervention. The measures of favorable effects are or should be prespecified in the protocol and they are limited in number. In contrast, the number of adverse events is typically very large and they are rarely prespecified in the protocol. Some may not even be known at the time of trial initiation. These facts introduce analytic challenges.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., Granger, C. B., & Moore, T. J. (2015). Assessment and Reporting of Harm. In Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (pp. 255–277). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18539-2_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free