Contrary to the common promise of the UN Charter, mass atrocities continue to be committed as the wars in Yemen and South Sudan or the fate of the Rohingya in Myanmar demonstrate. Using Germany as an example, this article examines the thesis that mass atrocity situations are silenced which inhibits their politicisation. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature on silencing and theoretical approaches (agenda-setting, desecuritisation, discourse-bound identity theory) a working definition of silencing in foreign policy is proposed. Silencing appears to be a structural feature of ‘identity mismatch’ characterised by three modes: non-mentioning, trivialisation and framing. A rhetoric-analysis of speech acts by the German chancellor, foreign ministers and leaders of the parliamentary groups on the aforementioned cases shows in which way the German political elite in fact silences mass atrocities.
CITATION STYLE
Hering, R., & Stahl, B. (2022). When mass atrocities are silenced: Germany and the cases of Yemen, South Sudan, and Myanmar. Journal of International Relations and Development, 25(3), 608–634. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00254-2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.