Evaluating the privacy properties of telephone metadata

76Citations
Citations of this article
156Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since 2013, a stream of disclosures has prompted reconsideration of surveillance lawand policy. One of themost controversial principles, both in the United States and abroad, is that communications metadata receives substantially less protection than communications content. Several nations currently collect telephone metadata in bulk, including on their own citizens. In this paper, we attempt to shed light on the privacy properties of telephone metadata. Using a crowdsourcing methodology,we demonstrate that telephone metadata is densely interconnected, can trivially be reidentified, and can be used to draw sensitive inferences.

References Powered by Scopus

Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks

34515Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy

6591Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Differential privacy

3953Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Data mining for health: staking out the ethical territory of digital phenotyping

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Data Security and Privacy in Apps for Dementia: An Analysis of Existing Privacy Policies

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preserving mobile subscriber privacy in open datasets of spatiotemporal trajectories

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mayer, J., Mutchler, P., & Mitchell, J. C. (2016). Evaluating the privacy properties of telephone metadata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(20), 5536–5541. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508081113

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 64

58%

Researcher 26

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 38

47%

Social Sciences 27

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 9

11%

Engineering 7

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 35
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 41

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free