Knowledge Contribution as a Factor in Project Selection

8Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Project selection is a crucial decision-making process in many organizations. By adopting a project-based learning perspective, this study sets out to develop a framework to integrate organizational knowledge development with project selection. We utilize various knowledge management models to create a structured evaluation metric to measure project contribution to organizational knowledge. A project selection model, which involves project knowledge contribution as one of the evaluation perspectives, is proposed. Results of a focus group study effectively validate the proposed evaluation metric. The article concludes with an empirical implementation of the model in an electronic component manufacturing company.

References Powered by Scopus

How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process

7133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms

2756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary

1211Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Project portfolio management information systems’ positive influence on performance – the importance of process maturity

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bridging the knowledge gap between technology and business: An innovation strategy perspective

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Executives’ Decision Processes at the Front End of Major Projects: The Role of Context and Experience in Value Creation

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geng, S., Chuah, K. B., Law, K. M. Y., Cheung, C. K., Chau, Y. C., & Rui, C. (2018). Knowledge Contribution as a Factor in Project Selection. Project Management Journal, 49(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281804900103

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

76%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Researcher 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 29

57%

Engineering 17

33%

Computer Science 3

6%

Energy 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free