Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 17

16Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recommendations by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi regarding proposals to amend the Code pertaining to fungi are reported. A 60% or greater majority recommends acceptance of proposals on: (1) the governance of fungi in the Code: Gen. Prop. A-B, Div. III Prop. F (016-018); (2) exclusion of microsporidian and other "zoological" fungi: Pre. Prop. A, Art. 13 Prop. A, Art. 45 Prop. A-B, Art. 54 Prop. A [(048-051), (190)]; (3) typification and orthography of sanctioned names: Art. 7 Prop. I, Art. 9 Prop. J-M, Rec. 9C (new) Prop. A-C, Art. 10 Prop C, Art. 15 Prop. A, [(185), (224-228, 231-232)]; (4) compulsory deposition of fungal names in a recognized repository: Art. 7 Prop. L, Art. 33 Prop. B, Rec. 37bisA (new) Prop. B, Art. 37bis (new) Prop. A, Rec. 37bisA (new) Prop. A [(117-119), (183-184)]; (5) designation of type cultures: Rec. 8B Prop. A (138); (6) teleotypification: Art. 9 Prop. V-W, (294-295); (7) electronic publication of names: Art. 29 Prop. A-C, Rec. 29A Prop. A-B, Art. 30 Prop. A-B, Rec. 30A Prop. A-B, Art. 31 Prop. A-B (203-213); (8) permission to use either a Latin or English diagnosis: Art. 36 Prop. C-E, Rec. 36A Prop. C (186-189); and (9) anamorphic names: Art. 14 Prop. C, Ch. VI Prop. A, Art. 59 Prop. C-I, K-L [(296-302, 304-306) (307)]. A 50%-57% majority recommends acceptance of proposals on: (1) typification of sanctioned names: Art. 15 Prop. B-C (229-230); and (2) anamorphic names: Art. 59 Prop. J (303). A 60% or greater majority recommends rejection of proposals on: (1) deletion of Art. 7.8: Art. 7 Prop. H (223); (2) redefining "protologue" and "original material" for sanctioned names: Art. 7 Prop. J, Art. 9 Prop. I (220-221); and (3) anamorphic names: Art. 59 Prop. A (172). A 50%-57% majority recommends rejection of proposals on: (1) anamorphic names: Art. 59 Prop. B, M-P, Prop. B and Rec. 59A Prop. A-C [(173-174) (308-313)]; and (2) governance of fungal nomenclature: Div. III Prop. G-H (019-020).

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature

337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Refined families of Dothideomycetes: orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New combinations in Lactifluus. 1. L. subgenera Edules, Lactariopsis, and Russulopsis

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Norvell, L. L. (2011). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 17. Taxon, 60(2), 610–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.602048

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘22‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0