Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Global Markers of Transcriptional Diversity across Different Forms of Cellular Senescence

Abstract

Cellular Senescence is a state of irreversible cell cycle arrest, and the accumulation of senescent cells contributes to agerelated organismal decline. The detrimental effects of cellular senescence are due to the senescence associated secretory phenotype (SASP), an array of signaling molecules and growth factors secreted by senescent cells that contribute to the terile inflammation associated with aging tissues. Recent studies, both in vivo and in vitro, have highlighted the heterogeneous nature of the senescence phenotype. In particular, single cell transcriptomics has revealed that Oncogene Induced Senescence (OIS) is characterized by the presence of subpopulations of cells expressing different SASP profiles. We have generated a comprehensive dataset via single-cell transcriptional profiling of genetically homogenous clonal cell lines from different forms of senescence, including OIS, Replicative Senescence (RS), and DNA Damage Induced Senescence (DDIS). We identified subpopulations of cells that are common to all three major forms of senescence and show that the expression profiles of these subpopulations are driven by markers formerly identified in individual forms of senescence. These common signatures are characterized by chromatin modifiers, inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and Ribosomal protein expression. The expression patterns of these subpopulations recapitulate primary and secondary senescence, a phenomenon where a preexisting (primary) senescent cell induces senescence in a neighboring (secondary) cell through cell-to-cell contact. Since it is still unclear what type of senescence occurs in-vivo with age, it is important to know that the formation of primary and secondary populations is common to multiple types of senescence since this mechanism could help explain how senescent cells accumulate in aged organisms. Finally, we show that these subpopulations show differential susceptibility to the senolytic agent Navitoclax, suggesting that senolytic agents targeting the apoptotic pathways may be clearing only a subset of senescent cells based on their inflammatory profiles in-vivo. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.