Impact of pulse oximetry surveillance on rescue events and intensive care unit transfers: A before-and-after concurrence study

239Citations
Citations of this article
186Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Some preventable deaths in hospitalized patients are due to unrecognized deterioration. There are no publications of studies that have instituted routine patient monitoring postoperatively and analyzed impact on patient outcomes. Methods: The authors implemented a patient surveillance system based on pulse oximetry with nursing notification of violation of alarm limits via wireless pager. Data were collected for 11 months before and 10 months after implementation of the system. Concurrently, matching outcome data were collected on two other postoperative units. The primary outcomes were rescue events and transfers to the intensive care unit compared before and after monitoring change. Results: Rescue events decreased from 3.4 (1.89-4.85) to 1.2 (0.53-1.88) per 1,000 patient discharges and intensive care unit transfers from 5.6 (3.7-7.4) to 2.9 (1.4-4.3) per 1,000 patient days, whereas the comparison units had no change. Conclusions: Patient surveillance monitoring results in a reduced need for rescues and intensive care unit transfers. Copyright © 2010, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taenzer, A. H., Pyke, J. B., McGrath, S. P., & Blike, G. T. (2010). Impact of pulse oximetry surveillance on rescue events and intensive care unit transfers: A before-and-after concurrence study. Anesthesiology, 112(2), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ca7a9b

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free