Efficacy evaluation of a non-human experimental model for ultrasound-guided superficial venous puncture: Clinical randomized assay

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The use of a venipuncture simulator facilitates technique learning and improves skills, which reduces the risk of venipuncture complications in humans. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a non-human experimental model for Ultrasound guided superficial venipuncture. Methods: We randomized 39 nurses in two groups: A and B. The training had three steps: 1-theoretical class, 2-practical class, with the ultrasound device and 3-ultrasound-guided puncture training in the non-human model. The group A participated in steps 1, 2 and 3 and group B in steps 1 and 2. After training, both groups were released for ultrasound guided venipuncture. Results: The success in puncture in group A (n = 20) was 90% and in group B (n = 19) it was 68.42%. In the sum of the identification and the puncture times, the average of group A was 61.5 seconds (95% CI, 33.58; 106.95) and in group B was 148.0 seconds (95% CI, 114.54; 208.44), which was statistically significant (p = 0.007, without overlapping the interval estimates). Conclusion: Nurses who received training with the nonhuman model had better identification and puncture times © The authors (2019)..

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nardino, É. P., Kafejian-Haddad, A. P., Silva, D. A. P., & Correa, J. A. (2019). Efficacy evaluation of a non-human experimental model for ultrasound-guided superficial venous puncture: Clinical randomized assay. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 29(2), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v29.9428

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free