In 2019, William Twining and Harry Arthurs, academic lawyers whose careers peaked during the second half of the twentieth century, published memoirs revealing the central motivations and forces underlying their intellectual endeavor. Their books are a source of great nourishment, provoking readers to think deeply about the central challenges of the discipline of law and what might be done to bring it closer to realizing its full potential. They also reveal what it was like to be a leading academic who pushed disciplinary boundaries, challenging central disciplinary norms repeatedly, over many decades, while the universities and societies surrounding them grew in size and enjoyed increased prosperity and while academics-legal and otherwise-were cast in changing lights. During this time, writing and teaching about the nature and purposes of law moved from the desks of a few well-known figures into the hands of an increasingly diverse mass. This review considers and compares the contributions of these memoirs to the history of legal scholars. It also examines the relevance of each book to their primary readership: Twenty-first century academic lawyers.
CITATION STYLE
Bartie, S. (2021, May 1). Taking the Discipline of Law Seriously: Twining, Arthurs, and Histories of Academic Lawyers. Law and History Review. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0738248021000158
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.