Mining rules for satellite imagery using evolutionary classification tree

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Classification Tree (CT) can establish explicit classification rules of Satellite Imagery (SI). However, the accuracy of explicit classification rules are poor. Back-Propagation Networks (BPN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) both can establish a highly accurate model to predict the classification of SI but cannot generate the explicit rules. This study proposes a novel mining rule method named Evolutionary Classification Tree (ECT) which is composed of Particle Bee Algorithm (PBA) and Classification Tree (CT) that automatically produce self-organized rules to predict the classification of SI. In ECT, CT plays the architecture to represent explicit rules and PBA plays the optimization mechanism to optimize CT to fit the experimental data. 600 experimental data sets were used to compare accuracy and complexity of four model building techniques, CT, BPN, SVM and ECT. The results showed that ECT can produce rules which are more accurate than CT and SVM but less accurate than BPN models. However, BPN is black box models while ECT can produce explicit rules which is an important advantage to mining the explicit rules and knowledge in practical applications.

References Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy classifications using fuzzy inference networks

10281Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm

3079Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting the compressive strength and slump of high strength concrete using neural network

383Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lien, L. C., Liu, Y. N., Cheng, M. Y., & Yeh, I. C. (2014). Mining rules for satellite imagery using evolutionary classification tree. In 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining, ISARC 2014 - Proceedings (pp. 689–696). University of Technology Sydney. https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2014/0093

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

40%

Researcher 2

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

75%

Computer Science 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free