Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclone biases in ECMWF subseasonal forecasts

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Extratropical cyclones influence midlatitude surface weather directly via precipitation and wind and indirectly via upscale feedbacks on the large-scale flow. Biases in cyclone frequency and characteristics in medium-range to subseasonal numerical weather prediction might therefore hinder exploitation of potential predictability on these timescales. We thus, for the first time, identify and track extratropical cyclones in 20 years (2000–2020) of subseasonal ensemble reforecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in the Northern Hemisphere in all seasons. The reforecasts reproduce the climatology of cyclone frequency and life-cycle characteristics qualitatively well up to six weeks ahead. However, there are significant regional biases in cyclone frequency, which can result from a complex combination of biases in cyclone genesis, size, location, lifetime, and propagation speed. Their magnitude is largest in summer, with the strongest regional deficit of cyclones of more than 30% in the North Atlantic, relatively large in spring, and smallest in winter and autumn. Moreover, the reforecast cyclones reach too-high intensities during most seasons, although intensification rates are captured well. An overestimation of cyclone lifetime might partly but not exclusively explain this intensity bias. While the cyclone bias patterns often appear in lead-time weeks 1 and 2, their magnitudes typically grow further at subseasonal lead times, in some cases up to weeks 5 and 6. Most of the dynamical sources of these biases thus likely appear in the early medium range, but sources on longer timescales probably contribute to the further increase of biases with lead time. Our study provides a useful basis to identify, better understand, and ultimately reduce biases in the large-scale flow and in surface weather in subseasonal weather forecasts. Given the considerable biases during summer, when subseasonal predictions of precipitation and surface temperature will become increasingly important, this season deserves particular attention for future research.

References Powered by Scopus

The ERA5 global reanalysis

15397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from the stratosphere to the troposphere

870Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden-Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation

638Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Why Moist Dynamic Processes Matter for the Sub-Seasonal Prediction of Atmospheric Blocking Over Europe

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of synoptic storm likelihood on European subseasonal forecast uncertainty and their modulation by the stratosphere

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regime-Dependent Characteristics and Predictability of Cold-Season Precipitation Events in the St. Lawrence River Valley

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Büeler, D., Sprenger, M., & Wernli, H. (2024). Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclone biases in ECMWF subseasonal forecasts. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 150(759), 1096–1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4638

Readers over time

‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0