Predicting and validating protein interactions using network structure

30Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Protein interactions play a vital part in the function of a cell. As experimental techniques for detection and validation of protein interactions are time consuming, there is a need for computational methods for this task. Protein interactions appear to form a network with a relatively high degree of local clustering. In this paper we exploit this clustering by suggesting a score based on triplets of observed protein interactions. The score utilises both protein characteristics and network properties. Our score based on triplets is shown to complement existing techniques for predicting protein interactions, outperforming them on data sets which display a high degree of clustering. The predicted interactions score highly against test measures for accuracy. Compared to a similar score derived from pairwise interactions only, the triplet score displays higher sensitivity and specificity. By looking at specific examples, we show how an experimental set of interactions can be enriched and validated. As part of this work we also examine the effect of different prior databases upon the accuracy of prediction and find that the interactions from the same kingdom give better results than from across kingdoms, suggesting that there may be fundamental differences between the networks. These results all emphasize that network structure is important and helps in the accurate prediction of protein interactions. The protein interaction data set and the program used in our analysis, and a list of predictions and validations, are available at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/bioinfo/resources/PredictingInteractions. © 2008 Chen et al.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, P. Y., Deane, C. M., & Reinert, G. (2008). Predicting and validating protein interactions using network structure. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000118

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 50

57%

Researcher 24

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48

63%

Computer Science 13

17%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

14%

Engineering 4

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free