Understanding clinicians’ perceived barriers and facilitators to optimal use of acute oxygen therapy in adults

12Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Supplemental oxygen is commonly administered to patients in acute care. It may cause harm when used inappropriately. Guidelines recommend prescription of acute oxygen, yet adherence is poor. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to practicing in accordance with the evidence-based Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) oxygen guideline, and to determine the beliefs and attitudes relating to acute oxygen therapy. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted. The survey consisted of 3 sections: (1) introduction and participant characteristics; (2) opinion/beliefs, knowledge and actions about oxygen therapy and other drugs; and (3) barriers and facilitators to use of the TSANZ guideline. Convenience sampling was employed. A paper-based survey was distributed at the TSANZ Annual Scientific Meeting. An online survey was emailed to the TSANZ membership and to John Hunter Hospital's clinical staff. Results: Responses were received from 133 clinicians: 52.6% nurses, 30.1% doctors, and 17.3% other clinicians. Over a third (37.7%) were unaware/unsure of the oxygen guideline’s existence. Most (79.8%) believe that oxygen is a drug and should be treated as one. Most (92.4%) stated they only administered it based on clinical need. For four hypothetical cases, there was only one where the majority of participants identified the optimal oxygen satura-tion. A number of barriers and facilitators were identified when asked about practicing in accordance with the TSANZ guideline. Lack of oxygen equipment, getting doctors to prescribe oxygen and oxygen being treated differently to other drugs were seen as barriers. The guideline itself and multiple clinician characteristics were considered facilitators. Conclusion: There is discordance between clinicians’ beliefs and actions regarding the administration of oxygen therapy and knowledge gaps about optimal oxygen therapy in acute care. Identified barriers and facilitators should be considered when developing evidence-based guidelines to improve dissemination and knowledge exchange.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients' care

3501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice

1020Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis

586Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand Position Statement on Acute Oxygen Use in Adults: ‘Swimming between the flags’

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A human factors approach to quality improvement in oxygen prescribing

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Doctors’ and Nurses’ Knowledge and Perceived Barriers Regarding Acute Oxygen Therapy in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nigeria

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cousins, J. L., Wark, P. A. B., Hiles, S. A., & McDonald, V. M. (2020). Understanding clinicians’ perceived barriers and facilitators to optimal use of acute oxygen therapy in adults. International Journal of COPD, 15, 2275–2287. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S263696

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

63%

Researcher 8

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 17

41%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

7%

Social Sciences 3

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free