Threat displacement instead of threat eradication: Some concluding caveats

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this brief concluding chapter of the book’s second part, I will offer a couple of warnings or ‘caveats’ before moving on to the more fundamental discussion of the merits and demerits of using technology as a sliver bullet against terrorism in the third part. First of all, I argue that the introduction of available technologies, especially off-the-shelf solutions, has been a rather slow and tedious one. Secondly, I argue that all the security measures discussed do not completely eradicate the threat posed by terrorists: they rather displace it to areas just outside the defence perimeters. And thirdly, I point out that some attacks simply cannot be prevented as long as we are not prepared to deploy plenty of sniffers, scanners and other detection devices all over the city.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lehr, P. (2019). Threat displacement instead of threat eradication: Some concluding caveats. In Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications (pp. 143–146). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90924-0_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free