The present study examines the impact of including various qualitative criteria for the selection of alternative transportation options in Delhi. Three alternative transport options viz. 4-stroke 2-wheelers, CNG cars and CNG buses are prioritized based on six different criteria - energy saving potential (energy), emission reduction potential (environment), cost of operation (cost), availability of technology (technology), adaptability of the option (adaptability) and barriers to implementation (barrier). Based on quantitative criteria 'energy', 'environment' and 'cost', CNG car showed more potential in contributing to environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi followed by 4-stroke 2-wheelers and CNG buses. Qualitative criteria viz. 'technology', 'adaptability' and 'barriers' in prioritization process resulted in higher priority for 4-stroke 2-wheelers followed by CNG bus and CNG car. Integrated quantitative and qualitative criteria gave a contrasting result as compared to that of the conventional quantitative approach and qualitative approach with highest priority for CNG bus followed by 4-stroke 2-wheelers and CNG car. This could explain the reasons for failure of many potential alternative urban transport options. ?? 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Patil, A., Herder, P., & Brown, K. (2010). Investment Decision Making for Alternative Fuel Public Transport Buses: The Case of Brisbane Transport. Journal of Public Transportation, 13(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.13.2.6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.