Cognitive error in an academic emergency department

18Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Medical error is a leading cause of death nationwide. While systems issues have been closely investigated as a contributor to error, little is known about the cognitive factors that contribute to diagnostic error in an emergency department (ED) environment. Eight months of patient revisits within 72 h where patients were admitted on their second visit were examined. Fifty-two cases of confirmed error were identified and classified using a modified version of the Australian Patient Safety Foundation classification system for medical errors by a group of trained physicians. Faulty information processing was the most frequently identified category of error (45% of cases), followed by faulty verification (31%). Faulty knowledge (6%) and faulty information gathering (18%) occurred relatively infrequently. "Misjudging the salience of a finding" and "premature closure" were the individual errors that occurred most frequently (13%). Despite the complex nature of diagnostic reasoning, cognitive errors of information processing appear to occur at higher rates than other errors, and in a similar pattern to an internal medicine service despite a different clinical environment. Further research is needed to elucidate why these errors occur and how to mitigate them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schnapp, B. H., Sun, J. E., Kim, J. L., Strayer, R. J., & Shah, K. H. (2018). Cognitive error in an academic emergency department. Diagnosis, 5(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free