Plasma creatinine determination in mice and rats: An enzymatic method compares favorably with a high-performance liquid chromatography assay

113Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of the colorimetric Jaffé method for the measurement of creatinine in mouse and rat plasma has been criticized as prior studies have shown a dramatic overestimation. We compared a colorimetric picric acid, an enzymatic, and a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method to assess their appropriateness for routine measurements of creatinine in plasma of healthy and diseased mice (n=61) and rats (n=56). For the colorimetric Jaffé method a pronounced overestimation is confirmed. Additionally the method showed interference with hemoglobin already in a very low, non-visible concentration range in rat plasma. The enzymatic measurement demonstrated a hemoglobin interference in mice, only when hemolysis was visible. The comparison between HPLC and the enzymatic measurement gave a good agreement between both methods in both species. Therefore the enzymatic method fulfills the requirements for a routine screening test for plasma creatinine in healthy as well as diseased mice and rats over a broad concentration range. © 2007 International Society of Nephrology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keppler, A., Gretz, N., Schmidt, R., Kloetzer, H. M., Groene, H. J., Lelongt, B., … Pill, J. (2007). Plasma creatinine determination in mice and rats: An enzymatic method compares favorably with a high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Kidney International, 71(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5001988

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free