Response to "Comment on 'The swimming of animalcules'" [Phys. Fluids 19, 079101 (2007)]

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The proof of the statement that a two-bead structure with constant mobilities cannot swim is incorrect. A general expression for the swimming velocity of a two-bead structure with given periodic relative motion is derived in the form of a line integral. The net torque exerted on the fluid is also expressed as a line integral. It is shown that in the example given by Friedman a net torque is exerted on the fluid. Therefore it is not acceptable as a swimming motion. A more complicated periodic relative motion is constructed for which the net torque vanishes, but which leads to a nonvanishing swimming velocity. A dynamical formulation appears to restrict the possibility of swimming. © 2007 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Felderhof, B. U. (2007). Response to “Comment on ‘The swimming of animalcules’” [Phys. Fluids 19, 079101 (2007)]. Physics of Fluids. American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2749543

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free