Aim: Comparing pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 and EU-approved reference adalimumab (EU-adalimumab) in Japan. Materials & methods: Double-blind, parallel-group phase I trial at three hospitals. Healthy Japanese adults were randomized (1:1) to CT-P17 or EU-adalimumab (single 40-mg subcutaneous dose). The primary end point was pharmacokinetic equivalence for area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum serum concentration. Results: Of the 205 randomized subjects (102 CT-P17, 103 EU-adalimumab), 204 received study drug. CT-P17 and EU-adalimumab were pharmacokinetically equivalent: 90% CIs for geometric least-squares mean ratios were within predefined 80-125% equivalence margins. Secondary pharmacokinetic end points, safety and immunogenicity were similar between the groups. Conclusion: CT-P17 had pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity comparable to EU-adalimumab in healthy Japanese adults.
CITATION STYLE
Haranaka, M., Tanaka, T., Kim, S. H., Bae, Y. J., Jeon, D. B., Choi, E. J., … Ogama, Y. (2023). Pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 (40 mg/0.4 ml) versus reference adalimumab: randomized study in healthy Japanese adults. Immunotherapy, 15(3), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2022-0181
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.