Pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 (40 mg/0.4 ml) versus reference adalimumab: randomized study in healthy Japanese adults

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: Comparing pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 and EU-approved reference adalimumab (EU-adalimumab) in Japan. Materials & methods: Double-blind, parallel-group phase I trial at three hospitals. Healthy Japanese adults were randomized (1:1) to CT-P17 or EU-adalimumab (single 40-mg subcutaneous dose). The primary end point was pharmacokinetic equivalence for area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum serum concentration. Results: Of the 205 randomized subjects (102 CT-P17, 103 EU-adalimumab), 204 received study drug. CT-P17 and EU-adalimumab were pharmacokinetically equivalent: 90% CIs for geometric least-squares mean ratios were within predefined 80-125% equivalence margins. Secondary pharmacokinetic end points, safety and immunogenicity were similar between the groups. Conclusion: CT-P17 had pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity comparable to EU-adalimumab in healthy Japanese adults.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haranaka, M., Tanaka, T., Kim, S. H., Bae, Y. J., Jeon, D. B., Choi, E. J., … Ogama, Y. (2023). Pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 (40 mg/0.4 ml) versus reference adalimumab: randomized study in healthy Japanese adults. Immunotherapy, 15(3), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2022-0181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free