How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research: a literature review and new data

18Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article provides the necessary tools to advance comparative research studying the substantive representation of ethnic minorities and women. Firstly, I clarify how the various indicators for individual representatives’ and parliaments’ considerateness of the interests of traditionally excluded groups used in earlier (mostly single-country) studies relate to each other and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of different measures for quantitative comparative research. Secondly, the present article introduces new data comprising three indicators for the substantive representation of ethnic minorities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kroeber, C. (2018). How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research: a literature review and new data. Representation, 54(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2018.1504112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free