Assessment aggregation in the evidential reasoning approach to MADM under uncertainty: Orthogonal versus weighted sum

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the evidential reasoning (ER) approach to multiple-attribute decision making (MADM) with uncertainty. The attribute aggregation problem in MADM under uncertainty is generally formulated as a problem of evidence combination. Then several new aggregation schemes are proposed and simultaneously their theoretical features are explored. A numerical example traditionally examined in published sources on the ER approach is used to illustrate the proposed techniques. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huynh, V. N., Nakamori, Y., & Ho, T. B. (2004). Assessment aggregation in the evidential reasoning approach to MADM under uncertainty: Orthogonal versus weighted sum. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30502-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free