Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Aziz M
  • Ahmed Z
  • Haghbin H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and study aims Recent studies evaluated the impact of i-scan in improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. We aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of this technique.Methods A thorough search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. Full-text RCTs and cohort studies directly comparing i-scan and HD colonoscopy were deemed eligible for inclusion. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled and compared using random effects model and DerSimonian-Laird approach. For each outcome, relative risk (RR), 95 % confidence interval (CI), and P value was generated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results A total of five studies with six arms were included in this analysis. A total of 2620 patients (mean age 58.6 ± 7.2 years and female proportion 44.8 %) completed the study and were included in our analysis. ADR was significantly higher with any i-scan (RR: 1.20, [CI: 1.06–1.34], P = 0.003) compared to HD colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ADR was significantly higher using i-scan with surface and contrast enhancement only (RR: 1.25, [CI: 1.07–1.47], P = 0.004).Conclusions i-scan has the potential to increase ADR using the surface and contrast enhancement method. Future studies evaluating other outcomes of interest such as proximal adenomas and serrated lesions are warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aziz, M., Ahmed, Z., Haghbin, H., Pervez, A., Goyal, H., Kamal, F., … Adler, D. G. (2022). Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy International Open, 10(06), E824–E831. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1794-0346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free