Effects of moisture condition and freeze/thaw cycles on surface soil aggregate size distribution and stability

99Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Freeze/thaw cycles can affect soil aggregate stability, which in turn impacts wind and water erosion. The objectives of this laboratory study were: (1) to determine the effect of variable freeze/thaw cycles and soil water conditions on aggregate size distribution and stability; and (2) to evaluate differences in aggregate size distribution and stability between disturbed soil and undisturbed soil cores as affected by freeze/thaw cycles and soil water conditions. Surface soil was collected before freezing in late fall of 2009. Aggregates isolated from disturbed soil or intact soil cores were subjected to a factorial combination of 3 gravimetric water content treatments: 0.15 m3 m-3, 0.23 m3 m-3 or 0.30 m3 m-3, and 3 freeze/thaw treatments: 0, 3, or 9 cycles. A freeze/thaw cycle involved soil freezing at -10° for 24 h, followed by thawing at 5°C for 24 h. Most aggregate size classes were affected significantly (P<0.05) by freeze/thaw cycles except for wet-sieved aggregates >5 mm. Dry-sieved aggregates were relatively more sensitive to the freeze/thaw treatment than wet-sieved aggregates. The mean weight diameter (MWD) of dry-sieved aggregates was significantly (P<0.05) greater at 0.3 m3 m-3 than 0.15 m3 m-3 water content, but the opposite trend was observed for MWD of wet aggregates and aggregate stability. There was a significant (P<0.05) response of the MWD in dry-sieved aggregates to the interactive freeze/thaw × water content effect that differed for aggregates obtained from disturbed soil and those in the undisturbed soil core, but not for the MWD of wet-sieved aggregates and aggregate stability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, E., Cruse, R. M., Chen, X., & Daigh, A. (2012). Effects of moisture condition and freeze/thaw cycles on surface soil aggregate size distribution and stability. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 92(3), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS2010-044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free