Achieving margin negative resection—doing less is justified: Oncological outcomes of wedge excision of liver in gallbladder cancer (GBC) surgery

10Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The extent of liver resection for gallbladder cancer (GBC) is still debated. We evaluated the post-operative and oncological outcomes of patients with GBC who underwent liver wedge excision. Methods: Patients who underwent an upfront radical cholecystectomy (with a liver wedge excision of 2.5–3 centimetres) from June 2010 to December 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Results: In total, 558 patients underwent surgery for GBC of which 97 cases of primary GBC who underwent upfront radical cholecystectomy were selected. At a median follow up of 47 months, 57.7% of patients were disease free where as 16.5% were alive with disease. Two (2.1%) patients died in postoperative period, 17 (17.5%) patients died of disease, and 6 (6.2%) died of unrelated causes. Eleven patients had loco-regional recurrence and 22 failed at distant sites. Only one patient recurred in the gall bladder bed. Three-year overall survival (OS) of stage II was 86.1% and of stage III was 59.6%. Conclusions: In our series surgical outcomes of radical cholecystectomy with wedge resection of the liver emphasizes its oncological equivalence compared to formal segment IVb/V excision. Our experience with wedge resection gains significance in the absence of any level I evidence and can prompt a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) in future which may help in standardizing surgery for GBC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patkar, S., Patil, V., Rajgopal Acharya, M., Kurunkar, S., & Goel, M. (2019). Achieving margin negative resection—doing less is justified: Oncological outcomes of wedge excision of liver in gallbladder cancer (GBC) surgery. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.21037/cco.2019.07.07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free