Use of Electronic Cigarettes to Aid Long-Term Smoking Cessation in the United States: Prospective Evidence from the PATH Cohort Study

37Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are the preferred smoking-cessation aid in the United States; however, there is little evidence regarding long-Term effectiveness among those who use them. We used the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study to compare long-Term abstinence between matched US smokers who tried to quit with and without use of e-cigarettes as a cessation aid. We identified a nationally representative cohort of 2,535 adult US smokers in 2014-2015 (baseline assessment), who, in 2015-2016 (exposure assessment), reported a past-year attempt to quit and the cessation aids used, and reported smoking status in 2016-2017 (outcome assessment; self-reported ≥12 months continuous abstinence). We used propensity-score methods to match each e-cigarette user with similar nonusers. Among US smokers who used e-cigarettes to help quit, 12.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.1%, 16.7%) successfully attained long-Term abstinence. However, there was no difference compared with matched non-e-cigarette users (cigarette abstinence difference: 2%; 95% CI:-3%, 7%). Furthermore, fewer e-cigarette users were abstinent from nicotine products in the long term (nicotine abstinence difference:-4%; 95% CI:-7%,-1%); approximately two-Thirds of e-cigarette users who successfully quit smoking continued to use e-cigarettes. These results suggest e-cigarettes may not be an effective cessation aid for adult smokers and, instead, may contribute to continuing nicotine dependence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, R., Pierce, J. P., Leas, E. C., White, M. M., Kealey, S., Strong, D. R., … Messer, K. (2020). Use of Electronic Cigarettes to Aid Long-Term Smoking Cessation in the United States: Prospective Evidence from the PATH Cohort Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 189(12), 1529–1537. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa161

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free