Validation of a fornix depth measurer: A putative tool for the assessment of progressive cicatrising conjunctivitis

29Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/aims: Documentation of conjunctival forniceal foreshortening in cases of progressive cicatrising conjunctivitis (PCC) is important in ascertaining disease stage and progression. Lower fornix shortening is often documented subjectively or semi-objectively, whereas upper forniceal obliteration is seldom quantified. Although tools such as fornix depth measurers (FDMs) have been described, their designs limit upper fornix measurement. The purpose of this study was to custom-design a FDM to evaluate the upper fornix and to assess variability in gauging fornix depth. Methods: A polymethylmethacrylate FDM was constructed using industry-standard jewellery computer software and machinery. Two observers undertook a prospective independent evaluation of central lower fornix depth in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with clinically normal and abnormal conjunctival fornices both subjectively and by using the FDM (in mm). Upper central fornix depth was also measured. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Results: Fifty-one eyes were evaluated. There was 100% intraobserver agreement to within 1 mm for each observer for lower fornix measurement. The mean difference in fornix depth loss using the FDM between observer 1 and 2 was 1.19%, with 95% confidence of agreement (±2SD) of -15% to +20%. In total, 86% (44/51) of measurements taken by the two observers agreed to within 10% of total lower fornix depth (ie, ±1 mm) versus only 63% (32/51) of the subjective measurements. Mean upper fornix difference was 0.57 mm, with 95% confidence of agreement of between -2 and +3 mm. Conclusions: This custom-designed FDM is well tolerated by patients and shows low intraobserver and interobserver variability. This enables repeatable and reproducible measurement of upper and lower fornix depths, facilitating improved rates of detection and better monitoring of progression of conjunctival scarring.

References Powered by Scopus

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

42120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid

197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Correlation, Agreement, and Bland-Altman Analysis: Statistical Analysis of Method Comparison Studies

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology – Part I

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incidence, presenting features, and diagnosis of cicatrising conjunctivitis in the United Kingdom

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, G. P., Saw, V. P. J., Saeed, T., Evans, S. T., Cottrell, P., Curnow, S. J., … Rauz, S. (2011). Validation of a fornix depth measurer: A putative tool for the assessment of progressive cicatrising conjunctivitis. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 95(6), 842–847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.188011

Readers over time

‘11‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Researcher 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

73%

Computer Science 2

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

7%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0