Reward and novelty enhance imagination of future events in a motivational-episodic network

13Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thinking about personal future events is a fundamental cognitive process that helps us make choices in daily life. We investigated how the imagination of episodic future events is influenced by implicit motivational factors known to guide decision making. In a two-day functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we controlled learned reward association and stimulus novelty by pre-familiarizing participants with two sets of words in a reward learning task. Words were repeatedly presented and consistently followed by monetary reward or no monetary outcome. One day later, participants imagined personal future events based on previously rewarded, unrewarded and novel words. Reward association enhanced the perceived vividness of the imagined scenes. Reward and novelty-based construction of future events were associated with higher activation of the motivational system (striatum and substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area) and hippocampus, and functional connectivity between these areas increased during imagination of events based on rewardassociated and novel words. These data indicate that implicit past motivational experience contributes to our expectation of what the future holds in store.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Experimental design. (A) Trial sequence for the reward task on day 1. Words were repeatedly presented to ensure familiarization and reward learning. Each word indicated whether subjects could win money for a correct response in the letter case discrimination task. In rewarded trials, subjects received win feedback (image of gold coins) for correct responses and no-win feedback (grey-scale, scrambled image) for incorrect responses. Neutral trials were always followed by no-win feedback. (B) Trial sequence for the future imagery task on day 2. A text instruction indicated the task to be performed (“imagine an event” or “find two words”). In imagery trials, participants closed their eyes after processing the instruction and cue word, constructed a future event associated with the cue word, then pressed a button and continued to imagine additional details for the event. An audio signal indicated the end of the imagery period. Subjects opened their eyes and provided self-paced ratings of the imagined event on five scales: difficulty, vividness, coherence, valence, and similarity to an existing memory.
  • Fig 2. Behavioural ratings.Mean ratings of the imagined events provided by subjects. Difficulty, vividness, coherence and memory ratings were based on 5-point rating scales (1 = low, 5 = high). The valence rating was based on a scale ranging from -3 to +3, which was converted for display purposes to a scale ranging from 1 = very negative to 7 = very positive. Error bars indicate SEM.
  • Fig 3. Effects of reward and novelty on the imagination of future events. (A-D) Neural activity for imagination based on rewarded words compared to familiar neutral words during the construction phase of the task. In reward-based trials, activations were significantly higher (p < .05, SVC) in (A) left hippocampus (MNI peak coordinates -24, -22, -17), (B) right mPFC (MNI 6, 53, 25), (C) left ventral striatum (MNI -18, 5, -5) and (D) right SN/VTA (MNI 6, -22, -17). (E-G) Neural activity for imagination based on novel words compared to familiar neutral words during the construction phase of the task. In novel trials, activations were significantly higher in (E) left hippocampus (MNI -24, -25, -20), (F) right mPFC (MNI 9, 50, 31), and (G) right ventral striatum (MNI 15, 11, -5). Clusters are shown in ROI masks in neurological orientation at a display threshold of p < 0.005, uncorrected. To better localize SN/VTA activations, panel D displays an overlay onto an MT image (see Experimental Procedures). Color bars indicate t values.
  • Fig 4. Effects of reward and novelty on functional connectivity. Significant increases in functional connectivity (p < .05, SVC) with the hippocampus during the elaboration phase for imagination based on (A) rewarded and (B) novel words compared to familiar neutral words. (A) Increased connectivity in reward compared to neutral trials between the left hippocampus seed and right ventral striatum (MNI peak coordinates 15, 14, -5). (B) Increased connectivity in novel compared to familiar neutral trials between the left hippocampus seed and (B) right SN/VTA (MNI peak coordinates 6, -16, -20). Clusters are shown in ROI masks in neurological orientation at a display threshold of p < 0.005, uncorrected. To better localize SN/VTA activations, panel B displays an overlay onto an MT image (see Experimental Procedures). Color bars indicate t values.
  • Fig 5. Changes in reward-associated connectivity with individual differences in vividness. In the elaboration phase, gPPI analysis revealed significant increases in functional connectivity (p < .05, SVC) in reward compared to neutral trials with increasing individual Rew-Neut difference in vividness scores between the right SN/VTA seed and (A) left hippocampus (MNI peak coordinates -24, -22, -17), (B) right hippocampus (MNI 27, -19, -17), and C) right ventral striatum (MNI 9, 17, -11). Clusters are shown in ROI masks in neurological orientation at a display threshold of p < 0.005, uncorrected. To better localize SN/ VTA activations, the top panel displays an overlay onto an MT image (see Experimental Procedures). Color bars indicate t values.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

33Citations
101Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bulganin, L., & Wittmann, B. C. (2015). Reward and novelty enhance imagination of future events in a motivational-episodic network. PLoS ONE, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143477

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

66%

Researcher 13

34%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 14

40%

Psychology 14

40%

Social Sciences 4

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0