Participatory gains and policy effectiveness: The open method of co-ordination information society

7Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article provides empirical findings on the relationship between the open method of co-ordination and participation (OMC). Empirically, it draws on within-case analysis to examine how participation, venues and outcomes have varied in different domains of information society policy. This is a challenging case for claims about the participatory effects of the OMC because it is not a policy originally designed to address social policy concerns or unemployment problems. The main conceptual argument is that the OMC is a political opportunity structure that distributes participatory gains. The article examines this opportunity structure by separating out the dimensions of 'procedure' and 'outcomes' and including 'transparency' as a moderating variable. The findings point to participatory effects in all but one case, although not for the same actors and at the same level (European Union or national/sub-national). © 2013 The Author(s) JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harcourt, A. (2013). Participatory gains and policy effectiveness: The open method of co-ordination information society. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free