Vitamin D: Too much testing and treating?

43Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is clinical uncertainty as to the testing of serum 25-Hydroxy vitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations and when to use high-dose supplementation. Data show that there has been a rapid increase in the number of tests performed within the Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust over the past 8 years and an increase in high-dose supplementation over the past 5 years. We performed a retrospective analysis of the 25(OH)D test requests over the period from January to October 2017. A total of 17,405 tests were performed in this time period. The overall average concentration was 57.5 nmol/L and this fi gure was similar across age groups, although a larger proportion of patients aged over 75 had a concentration <25 nmol/L. Test requests were classifi ed into 'appropriate', 'inappropriate' and 'uncertain' categories based on current expert opinion. We found that between 70.4% and 77.5% of tests could be inappropriate, depending on whether the 'uncertain' categories of falls and osteoporosis are considered to be justifi ed. Tiredness, fatigue or exhaustion was the reason for testing in 22.4% of requests. We suggest that a more rational approach to testing, and subsequent treating, could lead to reductions in costs to the healthcare system and patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woodford, H. J., Barrett, S., & Pattman, S. (2018). Vitamin D: Too much testing and treating? Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 18(3), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.18-3-196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free