Should a trainee be allowed to return to anesthesiology after narcotic diversion and presumed addiction?

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Strong rumors quickly solidified when a resident who was suspected of diverting narcotics was caught in the men’s locker room by his co-residents, injecting a drug in a ‘hep lock’ intravenous line that was placed in his left saphenous vein. The resident confessed that he was injecting fentanyl and begged the residents not to ‘rat him out.’ Although the residents agreed to his face, 2 went to the Chair’s office to report this issue immediately. The Chair grabbed a senior attending to serve as a witness in confronting the resident. Apparently, the Chair had experience with this ongoing issue. I was also asked to witness the event. Although I had been a program director for many years in the Deep South, this issue had never come up before in my career.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scher, C. S. (2016). Should a trainee be allowed to return to anesthesiology after narcotic diversion and presumed addiction? In You’re Wrong, I’m Right: Dueling Authors Reexamine Classic Teachings in Anesthesia (pp. 429–430). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43169-7_120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free