Disparity in risk factor pattern in premature versus late-onset coronary artery disease: A survey of 15,381 patients

Abstract

Background: There are few data available regarding the specificity and modifiability of major cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in patients with premature versus (vs) late-onset coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was designed to analyze and compare these risk factors. Patients and methods: Data from 15,381 consecutive patients (mean age, 62.3 ± 11.7 years; female, 33.8%) hospitalized with CAD were collected from a large-scale registry (Transparency Registry to Objectify Guideline-Oriented Risk Factor Management) and analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups, depending on age at inclusion: group 1 patients (n = 5725; mean age, 50.5 ± 7.2 years) were males aged, 55 years and females aged, 65 years; group 2 patients (n = 9656; mean age, 69.4 ± 7.4 years) were males aged. 55 years and females aged. 65 years and had a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of.100 mg/dL on admission to cardiac rehabilitation. Besides the conventional risk factors, lipoprotein(a) concentrations and glucose tolerance were measured facultatively. Univariate (chi-square test) and multivariate logistic regression models were used. Results: Cigarette smoking (group 1 at 31.5% vs group 2 at 9.4%; P, 0.001), family history of CAD (group 1 at 43.6% vs group 2 at 26.5%; P, 0.001), and dyslipidemia (group 1 at 92.7% vs group 2 at 91.8%; P, 0.001) were dominant risk factors in the younger group. Arterial hypertension (group 1 at 71.4% vs group 2 at 87.0%; P, 0.001) and diabetes (group 1 at 23.5% vs group 2 at 30.1%; P, 0.001) were dominant risk factors in the older group. Impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes were less frequent in the younger group (Ptrend = 0.038), and identical lipoprotein(a) concentration levels of.30 mg/dL were found in both groups (8.0%; P = 0.810). Modification of lipid profile and blood pressure was more effective in the younger group (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 100 mg/dL: group 1 at 66.3% vs group 2 at 61.1%; systolic blood pressure, 140 mmHg: group 1 at 91.7% vs group 2 at 83.0%; P, 0.001). Conclusion: CV risk factors differ markedly between premature and non-premature CAD. Cardiac rehabilitation provides an opportunity to reinforce secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome. © 2012 Reibis et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.