Surgical emergencies

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Most surgical problems in cancer patients are not urgent. Tumors rarely grow or metastasize rapidly. Surgical evaluation can usually proceed at a measured pace over a number of weeks to accurately assess the patient's underlying cancer, to define associated comorbidities that may modify treatment decisions, to consult various disciplines to devise multimodal therapies, and to work with patients and families to create care plans that account for patient preferences and family needs. In light of this panoply of issues that affect surgical decision making in cancer patients, the presence of a surgical emergency requiring prompt evaluation and intervention is especially problematic. Thorough evaluation of cardiac, pulmonary, and other comorbidities may not be feasible. Discussions with medical and radiation oncologists and other consultants may be constrained by time and availability. Attempts to inform and understand patient and family wishes may be confounded by changes in emotional state and cognitive ability caused by pain, anxiety, fear, and the need to intervene promptly. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

August, D. A., Kearney, T., & Schwarz, R. E. (2006). Surgical emergencies. In Oncology: An Evidence-Based Approach (pp. 1332–1348). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31056-8_73

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free