Comparison of the effects of vitamin D products in a psoriasis plaque test and a murine psoriasis xenograft model

19Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of Daivobet®and calcipotriol on clinical score and biomarker responses in a modified version of the Scholtz-Dumas psoriasis plaque assay. Furthermore, it was the aim to compare the effects of calcipotriol and betamethasone in the murine psoriasis xenograft model. Twenty four patients with psoriasis were treated topically once daily for three weeks, whereas the grafted mice were treated for four weeks. Clinical responses were scored twice weekly and biopsies were taken at the end of each study to analyse for skin biomarkers by histology and immunohistochemistry. The results clearly demonstrate effects on both clinical signs and biomarkers. In the patient study the total clinical score was reduced significantly with both Daivobet®and calcipotriol. Both treatments reduced epidermal thickness, Ki-67 and cytokeratin 16 expression. T cell infiltration was significantly reduced by Daivobet®but only marginally by calcipotriol. Both treatments showed strong effects on the epidermal psoriatic phenotype. Results from the xenograft model essentially showed the same results. However differences were observed when investigating subtypes of T cells. The study demonstrates the feasibility of obtaining robust biomarker data in the psoriasis plaque test that correlate well with those obtained in other clinical studies. Furthermore, the biomarker data from the plaque test correlate with biopsy data from the grafted mice. © 2009 Kvist et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kvist, P. H., Svensson, L., Hagberg, O., Hoffmann, V., Kemp, K., & Røpke, M. A. (2009). Comparison of the effects of vitamin D products in a psoriasis plaque test and a murine psoriasis xenograft model. Journal of Translational Medicine, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free