Associations of anthropometric adiposity indexes with hypertension risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis including PURE-China

43Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and objective: The association between hypertension and obesity has been confirmed, while no agreement has been reached about which anthropometric adiposity index is the best. This meta-analysis aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the associations of hypertension risk with body mass index (BMI), waist circumstance (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and a prospective urban and rural epidemiology study from China (PURE-China) was added into this meta-analysis as an individual study. Methods: Systematic literature searching was conducted to identify relevant articles published up to September 2018 in CNKI, WANFANG Data, Web of Science, SinoMed, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and cross-referencing. Literature reporting the association of hypertension risk with BMI, WC, WHR, and WHtR were defined as eligible. PURE-China data were analyzed and included as 1 eligible study into meta-analyses. Summary odds ratio (OR) and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were pooled using meta-analysis methods. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated. Subgroups based on gender, country and study design were conducted as well. Results: Thirty-eight original articles including PURE-China were included into meta-analyses, involving 309,585 subjects. WHtR had the strongest association with hypertension risk (OR, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, [CI]:1.29-2.19) and prediction ability (AUC, 70.9%; 95% CI: 67.8%-74.2%), which were also confirmed in subgroup analyses based on gender and country. However, BMI was found to have the highest prediction ability in adjusted models of PURE-China and followed WC, both of which were superior to WHtR (73.7% and 73.4% vs 73.2%). Conclusions: Our overall meta-analysis further confirmed WHtR as a good indicator at discriminating those individuals at increased risk of hypertension, and in some cases, it is better than BMI, WC, and WHR.

References Powered by Scopus

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

32714Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

9278Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115mmHg, 1990-2015

1678Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cardiometabolic-Based Chronic Disease, Adiposity and Dysglycemia Drivers: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of body roundness index in predicting metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of body roundness index (Bri) and a body shape index (absi) in predicting hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deng, G., Yin, L., Liu, W., Liu, X., Xiang, Q., Qian, Z., … Jiang, Y. (2018, November 1). Associations of anthropometric adiposity indexes with hypertension risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis including PURE-China. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013262

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

18%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

31%

Chemistry 2

13%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free