Interface structures and twinning mechanisms of twins in hexagonal metals

97Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A controversy concerning the description of (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) twinning, whether it is shear-shuffle or pure glide-shuffle or pure shuffle, has developed. There is disagreement about the interpretation of transmission electron microscopic observations, atomistic simulations and theories for twin growth. In this article, we highlight the atomic-level, characteristic, equilibrium and non-equilibrium boundaries and corresponding boundary defects associated with the three-dimensional ‘normal’, ‘forward’ and ‘lateral’ propagation of (Formula presented.) growth/annealing and deformation twins. Although deformation twin boundaries (TBs) after recovery exhibit some similarity to growth/annealing TBs because of the plastic accommodation of stress fields, there are important distinctions among them. These distinctions distinguish among the mechanisms of twin growth and resolve the controversy. In addition, a new type of disconnection, a glide disclination, is described for twinning. Synchroshear, seldom considered, is shown to be a likely mechanism for (Formula presented.) twinning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gong, M., Hirth, J. P., Liu, Y., Shen, Y., & Wang, J. (2017). Interface structures and twinning mechanisms of twins in hexagonal metals. Materials Research Letters, 5(7), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2017.1336496

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free