Analisis Kegagalan Consociational Approach dalam Perjanjian Naivasha Sudan

  • Yulianti D
  • Dermawan W
  • Yudistira M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Second Sudanese Civil War was a conflict between the Sudanese government and a separatist group from South Sudan, namely the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A). It was the most prolonged violent conflict in African history (1983-2005). The conflict officially ended after the signing of the Naivasha Agreement in 2005. In this agreement, there was an effort to resolve the conflict with a consociational approach that carried out project sharing between the conflicting parties. However, this agreement did not succeed in making Sudan free from conflict. This article will present an analysis of the failure to implement the consociational approach in creating positive peace in Sudan and South Sudan The findings of this research are that the power-sharing carried out in this agreement only involves elites. Apart from that, the distribution of resources other than oil has yet to be carried out, which should also be divided, taking into account identity factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yulianti, D., Dermawan, W., & Yudistira, M. A. (2024). Analisis Kegagalan Consociational Approach dalam Perjanjian Naivasha Sudan. Padjadjaran Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.24198/padjir.v6i1.40789

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free