Implementing description-logic rules for SNOMED-CT attributes through a table-driven approach

7Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Maintaining a large controlled biomedical vocabulary requires ensuring the content's internal consistency. This is done through rules, specified by the vocabulary's curators, which denote how the vocabulary's concepts should be defined. When individual organizations deploy such vocabularies, local concepts are typically added and linked to concepts in the main vocabulary: the process of maintaining and linking local content should follow the same rules. The operation of content-maintenance software can be facilitated by maintaining such rules in computable form. In this paper, we demonstrate how to implement computable rules for attribute usage in SNOMED CT using a table-driven approach where a given rule is expressed as one or more rows in a table and is consulted by generic code. This approach, which is tailored to database implementations, is computationally efficient and allows new attribute-definition rules to be created as data while needing minimal or no code modification.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Migrating existing clinical content from ICD-9 to SNOMED

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical research informatics: A conceptual perspective

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validating the semantics of a medical iconic language using ontological reasoning

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nadkarni, P. M., & Marenco, L. A. (2010). Implementing description-logic rules for SNOMED-CT attributes through a table-driven approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(2), 182–184. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2009.001792

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

59%

Researcher 8

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 16

46%

Medicine and Dentistry 16

46%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

6%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0