A Systematic Review of Physical Activity Intervention Programs in ASEAN Countries: Efficacy and Future Directions

3Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A systematic review was conducted on the efficacy of interventions to improve physical activity. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were scanned for eligible studies published from 1978 to August 2021, resulting in a total of 52 relevant studies for review. The Downs and Black checklist was used as a quality assessment ool for a risk of bias assessment. The 52 studies were then broadly categorised into three major approach types: informational, behavioural and/or social, as well as direct. Within each major approach, studies were further sub-categorised into more specific intervention types before being assessed for their efficacy and applicability. Overall, the intervention types that seemed to be the most efficacious in increasing physical activity levels were those that involved home-based information provision, community-wide campaigns, incentivised change, individually adapted health behaviour programs, family-based social support interventions and the provision of self-monitoring tools. However, the results must be interpreted holistically, as many of the successful interventions included more than one approach type and success is likely contingent on effectively addressing several concurrent facets. The systematic review is registered on PROSPERO. Registration number: 282752.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, Y. S., Chia, M., & Komar, J. (2022, May 1). A Systematic Review of Physical Activity Intervention Programs in ASEAN Countries: Efficacy and Future Directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free