The suicide assessment scale: Psychometric properties of a Norwegian language version

9Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Rating scales are valuable tools in suicide research and can also be useful supplements to the clinical interview in suicide risk assessments. This study describes the psychometric properties of a Norwegian language version of the Suicide Assessment Scale Self-report version (SUAS-S). Methods. Participants were fifty-two patients (mean age=39.3years, SD=10.7) with major depression (53.8%), bipolar disorder (25.0%) and/or a personality disorder (63.5%) referred to a psychiatric outpatient clinic. The SUAS-S, the screening section of the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS-5), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Becks Hopelessness Scale (BHS), the Symptom Check-List-90 R (SCL-90R) and the Clinical Global Impression for Severity of Suicidality (CGI-SS) were administered. One week later, the patients completed the SUAS-S a second time. Results: Cronbachs alpha for SUAS-S was 0.88 and the test-retest reliability was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93- 0.97). SUAS-S was positively correlated with the BSS-5 (r=0.66; 95% CI: 0.47-0.85) for the study sample as a whole and for the suicidal (r=0.52) and non-suicidal groups (r=0.50) respectively. There was no difference between the SUAS-S and the BSS-5 in the ability to identify suicidality. This ability was more pronounced when the suicide risk was high. There was a substantial intercorrelation between the score on the SUAS-S and the BDI (0.81) and the BHS (0.76). The sensitivity and specificity of the SUAS-S was explored and an appropriate clinical cut-off value was assessed. Conclusions: The study revealed good internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity for the Suicide Assessment Scale Self-report version. The discriminatory ability for suicidality was comparable to that of the BSS-5. © 2012 Koldsland et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Figures

  • Table 1 Intercorrelations with 95% CIs between scores on the SUAS-S, BSS-5, BDI and BHS
  • Figure 1 Co-variation between BSS-5 and SUAS-S sum scores shown as a solid line (all patients included).
  • Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity and predictive probability of SUAS-S and BSS-5 cut-off points for detecting
  • Table 2 Test score means with standard deviations and medians with quartiles and effect size in suicidal and non-suicidal patients
  • Table 4 Mean scores with standard deviations, medians with quartiles and effect size for the five SUAS-S thematic areas
  • Table 5 Intercorrelations with 95% CIs between the five areas of SUAS-S, BSS-5, BDI and BHS sum scores
  • Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic curves for SUAS-S with BSS-5 to diagnose suicidality.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale

4111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of suicidal intention: The Scale for Suicide Ideation

2550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global Assessment of Functioning: A Modified Scale

900Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Suicide prediction models: a critical review of recent research with recommendations for the way forward

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of big data analytics in predicting suicide

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experience of Shame Mediates the Relationship Between Pathological Narcissism and Suicidal Ideation in Psychiatric Outpatients

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koldsland, B. O., Mehlum, L., Mellesdal, L. S., Walby, F. A., & Diep, L. M. (2012). The suicide assessment scale: Psychometric properties of a Norwegian language version. BMC Research Notes, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-417

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

52%

Researcher 11

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 18

46%

Medicine and Dentistry 16

41%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

8%

Arts and Humanities 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0