Pre-frontal cortical activity during walking and turning is reliable and differentiates across young, older adults and people with Parkinson's disease

62Citations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Mobility declines with age and further with neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson's disease (PD). Walking and turning ability, in particular, are vital aspects of mobility that deteriorate with age and are further impaired in PD. Such deficits have been linked with reduction in automatic control of movement and the need for compensatory cognitive cortical control via the pre-frontal cortex (PFC), however the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. Establishing and using a robust methodology to examine PFC activity during continuous walking and turning via mobile functional near infra-red spectroscopy (fNIRS) may aid in the understanding of mobility deficits and help with development of appropriate therapeutics. This study aimed to: (1) examine test re-test reliability of PFC activity during continuous turning and walking via fNIRS measurement; and (2) compare PFC activity during continuous turning and walking in young, old and Parkinson's subjects. Methods: Twenty-five young (32.3 ± 7.5 years), nineteen older (65.4 ± 7.0 years), and twenty-four PD (69.3 ± 4.1 years) participants performed continuous walking and 360° turning-in-place tasks, each lasting 2 min. Young participants repeated the tasks a second time to allow fNIRS measurement reliability assessment. The primary outcome was PFC activity, assessed via measuring changes in oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) concentrations. Results: PFC activity during continuous walking and turning was moderately reproducible (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.67). The PD group had higher PFC activation than young and older adults during walking and turning, with significant group differences for bilateral PFC activation (p = 0.025), left PFC activation (p = 0.012), and the early period (first 40 s) of walking (p = 0.007), with greater activation required in PD. Interestingly, older adults had similar PFC activation to young adults across conditions, however older adults required greater activation than young adults during continuous turning, specifically the early period of the turning task (Cohens d = 0.86). Conclusions: PFC activity can be measured during continuous walking and turning tasks with acceptable reliability, and can differentiate young, older and PD groups. PFC activation was significantly greater in PD compared to young and older adults during walking, particularly when beginning to walk.

References Powered by Scopus

Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results

5195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson's disease

3579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement

1955Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A consensus guide to using functional near-infrared spectroscopy in posture and gait research

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Association between Prefrontal Cortex Activity and Turning Behavior in People with and without Freezing of Gait

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Levodopa Facilitates Prefrontal Cortex Activation During Dual Task Walking in Parkinson Disease

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stuart, S., Belluscio, V., Quinn, J. F., & Mancini, M. (2019). Pre-frontal cortical activity during walking and turning is reliable and differentiates across young, older adults and people with Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Neurology, 10(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00536

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 47

67%

Researcher 17

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 22

50%

Engineering 10

23%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

14%

Psychology 6

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free