Feasibility of mid-frequency ventilation among infants with respiratory distress syndrome

2Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mid-frequency ventilation, a strategy of using conventional ventilators at high frequencies, may reduce lung injury but has had limited evaluation in neonates. Hence, a randomized crossover study was designed to assess the feasibility of using mid-frequency ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: Twelve preterm infants (>500 g and >24 weeks gestational age) who were receiving pressure-limited conventional ventilation with frequencies <60 breaths/min for respiratory distress syndrome were randomized to periods of mid-frequency ventilation (conventional ventilation with the fastest frequency up to 150 breaths/min that gave complete inspiration and expiration) or conventional ventilation (frequency <60 breaths/min), each lasting 2 h using a crossover design. Ventilator parameters were adjusted to maintain the O2 saturation and transcutaneous CO2 at baseline. RESULTS: Mean peak inspiratory pressure (15 = 4 cmH2Ovs 18 = 4 cmH2O, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhat, R., Kelleher, J., Ambalavanan, N., Chatburn, R. L., Mireles-Cabodevila, E., & Carlo, W. A. (2017). Feasibility of mid-frequency ventilation among infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Respiratory Care, 62(4), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free