Lessons from Orgreave: Police Power and the Criminalization of Protest

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In October 2016, the Home Secretary ruled out a public inquiry into the ‘Battle of Orgreave', arguing that ‘very few lessons’ could be learned from a review of practices of three decades ago. It was suggested that policing has undergone a progressive transformation since the 1984–5 miners’ strike, at political, legal, and operational levels. This article, in contrast, charts a significant expansion of state control over public protest since the strike, including a proliferation of public order offences and an extension of pre-emptive policing powers. Whilst concerns have been raised about the impact of these developments on protest rights, there is an absence of socio-legal research into the operation of public order powers in practice. In this article, I begin to fill this lacuna. Drawing on three empirical case-studies of protesters’ experiences of arrest and the criminal justice process, I highlight the relevance of Orgreave for contemporary policing practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilmore, J. (2019). Lessons from Orgreave: Police Power and the Criminalization of Protest. Journal of Law and Society, 46(4), 612–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free