Obstinate curiosity and situated solidarity in urban political ecology

10Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the field of urban political ecology (UPE) has developed into a robust theoretical framework for understanding the production of uneven socionatures. More recently, expanded theoretical and empirical innovations in UPE research are pushing the framework's radical roots into new and productive directions for addressing (not just critiquing) persistent inequalities and marginalizations in and beyond cities. We trace this trajectory of UPE towards its more transformative potential and argue that UPE's relevance will increase as scholars continue to embrace the power of what Povinelli calls “obstinate curiosity” to give rise to unexpected connections between people and ecologies. Specifically, we call for continued diversification of both theoretical and methodological starting points for UPE research, particularly with respect to the ways that scholars practice situated solidarity movements for social and environmental justice in cities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldfischer, E., Rice, J. L., & Black, S. T. (2020). Obstinate curiosity and situated solidarity in urban political ecology. Geography Compass, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12479

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free