Abstract
We argue that several apparently distinct responses to the hole argument, all invoking formal or mathematical considerations, should be viewed as a unified “mathematical response.” We then consider and rebut two prominent critiques of the mathematical response before reflecting on what is ultimately at issue in this literature.
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for freeCite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Bradley, C., & Weatherall, J. O. (2022). Mathematical Responses to the Hole Argument: Then and Now. Philosophy of Science, 89(5), 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.58
Readers' Seniority
Readers' Discipline
