ASSESSING the ASSOCIATIONS between TYPES of GREEN SPACE, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, and HEALTH INDICATORS USING GIS and PARTICIPATORY SURVEY

5Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study explores whether specific types of green spaces (i.e. urban green spaces, forests, agricultural lands, rangelands, and wetlands) are associated with physical activity, quality of life, and cardiovascular disease prevalence. A sample of 8,976 respondents from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, conducted in 2006 in Washington State across 291 zip-codes, was analyzed. Measures included physical activity status, quality of life, and cardiovascular disease prevalence (i.e. heart attack, angina, and stroke). Percentage of green spaces was derived from the National Land Cover Dataset and measured with Geographical Information System. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted to analyze the data while controlling for age, sex, race, weight, marital status, occupation, income, education level, and zip-code population and socio-economic situation. Regression results reveal that no green space types were associated with physical activity, quality of life, and cardiovascular disease prevalence. On the other hand, the analysis shows that physical activity was associated with general health, quality of life, and cardiovascular disease prevalence. The findings suggest that other factors such as size, structure and distribution (sprawled or concentrated, large or small), quality, and characteristics of green space might be important in general health, quality of life, and cardiovascular disease prevalence rather than green space types. Therefore, further investigations are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akpinar, A. (2017). ASSESSING the ASSOCIATIONS between TYPES of GREEN SPACE, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, and HEALTH INDICATORS USING GIS and PARTICIPATORY SURVEY. In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 47–54). Copernicus GmbH. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-47-2017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free